IPv6 not working
Added by mat Sch over 7 years ago
Hello,
I'm attempting to get a WT server known to work on IPv4 to work on IPv6. I changed the ---http-address to 0::0 and connected over IPv6. My WT server is seeing hundreds of sessions being started every minute from a single browser. I'm using URL in the config file to track sessions. Server info logs contain the following.
[2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.895082] 24800 - [info] "WebRequest: took 0.309ms"
[2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.896553] 24800 - [info] "Wt: session created (#sessions = 1619)"
fe80::9091:a6f9:c59b:e6dc%eth0 - - [2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.897269] "OPTIONS /ljaudioWidget?div=ljaudio&_=1492203087006 HTTP/1.1" 200 0
[2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.897316] 24800 - [info] "WebRequest: took 0.874ms"
[2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.898342] 24800 - [info] "Wt: session created (#sessions = 1620)"
fe80::9091:a6f9:c59b:e6dc%eth0 - - [2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.898970] "OPTIONS /ljaudioWidget?div=ljaudio&_=1492203087007 HTTP/1.1" 200 0
[2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.899002] 24800 - [info] "WebRequest: took 0.765ms"
[2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.900137] 24800 - [info] "Wt: session created (#sessions = 1621)"
fe80::9091:a6f9:c59b:e6dc%eth0 - - [2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.900581] "OPTIONS /ljaudioWidget?div=ljaudio&_=1492203087008 HTTP/1.1" 200 0
[2017-Apr-14 21:21:08.900610] 24800 - [info] "WebRequest: took 0.56ms"
Over IPv4 it looks as follows
[2017-Apr-14 21:33:23.096414] 3295 - [info] "Wt: session created (#sessions = 1)"
[2017-Apr-14 21:33:23.096652] 3295 [/ljaudioWidget vfk0aVsf3EqhGZiG] [info] "WEnvironment: UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/57.0.2987.133 Safari/537.36"
192.46.110.174 - - [2017-Apr-14 21:33:35.920960] "POST /ljaudioWidget?wtd=vfk0aVsf3EqhGZiG&wtt=widgetset HTTP/1.1" 200 111
Any idea what i'm doing wrong?
Also, how would I listen over both IPv4 and IPv6?
Thanks for assistance.
-mat
Replies (1)
RE: IPv6 not working - Added by Wim Dumon over 7 years ago
Hey Mat,
It's been a while since I tested IPv6 with Wt. Can you create an issue for this, so that we can assign it to someone?
Thank you,
Wim.