Rob Farmelo
- Login: rfarmelo
- Email: robert.farmelo@hp.com
- Are you a spammer?:
- Registered on: 01/12/2011
- Last sign in: 10/05/2011
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reported issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Activity
10/05/2011
- 11:33 PM Wt Help: RE: What operator declarations are needed for Dbo Tutorial8.C?
- Hi Koen,
Yes, the intent was to have the exact same behavior as in tutorial8. I've coded it up and it's compiling an... - 06:43 PM Wt Help: RE: What operator declarations are needed for Dbo Tutorial8.C?
- Hi Koen,
I'm implementing the < operator a little bit differently than tutorial8 because it's easier to automate ...
10/03/2011
- 06:16 PM Wt Help: RE: Wt::Dbo - Flexibility in persisting with references
- OK, great, thanks!
- 06:10 PM Wt Help: RE: What operator declarations are needed for Dbo Tutorial8.C?
- Great, thanks Koen. I'll just rely on the dbo::ptr version of the operator...
Rob
09/28/2011
- 02:01 AM Wt Help: RE: What operator declarations are needed for Dbo Tutorial8.C?
- Hi,
I'm guessing that in the snippet above, the comparison of person to other.person is ending up just comparing the...
09/25/2011
- Hi,
Tutorial8.C shows how to handle composite foreign key primary keys. I specifies that you must define a < oper...
09/20/2011
- 08:58 PM Wt Help: RE: Wt::Dbo - Flexibility in persisting with references
- Hi Koen,
Some time ago, in response to my scenario 3 above you wrote:
> for Many-to-One you cannot remove the objec...
09/14/2011
- 10:59 PM Wt Help: RE: Dbo: Composite foreign key primary keys operator<, operator==
- Hi Koen,
OK, will do as stated in the tutorial... Thanks for the quick reply!
Rob
- 10:07 PM Wt Help: RE: Dbo: Composite foreign key primary keys operator<, operator==
- For some reason the "==" symbol was removed from my post text. Here's a restatement of that text:
Hi,
I... - Hi,
In tutorial8.C some operators are defined for < and . I\'m not sure how these are used, but wanted to make su...
Also available in: Atom